Was Prince Pahlavi the leader of the unrest in Iran?
What happened in Iran on Thursday and Friday, January 8 and 9, in an unprecedented level of naked violence, was not organized and solely led by Pahlavi. Pahlavi should not be given any weight. In all these 47 years, Pahlavi has not had the ability to mobilize the people.
What happened was a “temporary consensus” of all the armed, guerrilla, and violent sects, groups, and organizations against the Islamic Republic.
1. PJAK 2. Democrat Party 3. Komola 4. People’s Mojahedin Organization 5. Congress of the Sixty 6. Restart 7. Emerging Mystics 8. Taheri Mystic Circle 9. Pak 10. Jaysh al-Dalum and…
Unlike in 1401, this time it was necessary to create a movement that had a head. In 1401, the movement was headless. It had no command or leadership. But this time, Pahlavi was made the head of the movement and it had a temporary function. Creating excitement, hatred, and anger against the Islamic Republic had to be shaped around a historical perspective on the regretful Pahlavi era.
Thursday and Friday were the war of the parties against the Islamic Revolution. It wasn’t even a normal riot or chaos. The only force that could put these armed and opposing groups on the same path was the orders and planning of the CIA and Mossad. This is where the real role and leadership of foreigners lies.
